89Comments
Dec 7, 2012 6:53PM
Dec 7, 2012 6:51PM
"We ought to require the broadcasters and cable/satellite providers to strike a deal that would give the public free access to at least what we now think of as basic cable.”
So, who's going to pay to get the cable to your house? You can already get all the broadcast channels for free, just get an antenna.
So, who's going to pay to get the cable to your house? You can already get all the broadcast channels for free, just get an antenna.
Dec 7, 2012 6:45PM
NOTHING but the air we breathe is truly free. EVERY product or service comes at a cost to someone. Even things that are perceived as "free" have their costs rolled into some product or service. What gripes people is that they pay once for a product or service, and then have to pay additional fees that should have been part of the payment for the original product or service in the first place. People also resent paying for products or service that they get no benefit from. The people who directly use or benefit from something should be the ones to pay for it. Simple.
Dec 7, 2012 6:33PM
And to balance the 'free' stuff, a 'duty' to public balance set of 'obligations/free work by the public. For instance - the 'free' education of young people balanced by military or public service labor obligation as for example France, Isreal, some other european countries- do 18 months military service before your 'free' state supported college- and that is for women in isreal. alternative service in denmark and Norway is various nursing home duties--and all this balanceing duty is at minimal cost, a simple monthly allowance for personal needs about 60 to 150 dollars same as the military pay. You want free trash pickup? - you do 6 hours a week on the trash truck at maybe a dollar a hour or free. . r '
Dec 7, 2012 6:24PM
Dec 7, 2012 6:16PM
Dec 7, 2012 6:06PM
it seems that regulation and serious limitations on ads would be in everyone's (including broadcasters) interest. limiting would allow broadcasters to charge advertisers more by limiting supply and thus increasing demand. the amount of advertising has gone way beyond obscene. i resent having to pay to have them imposed on me and am thinking about just going roku or something. tv has become a vast wasteland, and few broadcasts compare to pbs.
Dec 7, 2012 6:05PM
I can't say I agree with all of these...education & sanitation services especially, but I 100% agree with political campaigns. There is no reason the political parties should be spending billions to make the other guy look like a jerk when our economy is in the condition it is. It was disgusting. Record one ad for each candidate, have a couple of debates, then let the voters decide.
Dec 7, 2012 5:58PM
Dec 7, 2012 5:56PM
Report
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
DATA PROVIDERS
Quotes are real-time for NASDAQ, NYSE and AMEX. See delay times for other exchanges.
Fundamental company data and historical chart data provided by Thomson Reuters; click for restrictions. Real-time quotes provided by BATS Exchange. Real-time index quotes and delayed quotes supplied by Interactive Data Real-Time Services. Fund summary, fund performance and dividend data provided by Morningstar Inc. Analyst recommendations provided by Zacks Investment Research. StockScouter data provided by Verus Analytics. IPO data provided by Hoover's Inc. Index membership data provided by SIX Telekurs.
Japanese stock price data provided by Nomura Research Institute Ltd.; quotes delayed 20 minutes. Canadian fund data provided by CANNEX Financial Exchanges Ltd.
Smart Spending Blog
Strategies for saving more

